|
For Additional Information:
John Grasser (202) 463-2651
Karen Batra (202) 463-2651
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 30, 2000
ANSWERS TO CLIMATE QUESTIONS FOUND IN TECHNOLOGY, NOT KYOTO TREATY, NMA'S LAWSON TELLS SENATE
Washington--The time has come to move beyond the debate on the
flawed Kyoto Treaty and to move forward with sensible programs that
allow the United States to once and for all find the answers to
the questions about climate change, the National Mining Association
said today.
In testimony before the Senate Energy Committee, Richard L. Lawson,
NMA president and CEO, said that while climate is a long term, global
issue, we must all take it very seriously. "But, our preoccupation
with the Kyoto Protocol and the very real, negative implications
that its command and control regime has for our economy has effectively
precluded the debate that we must have on the policy and research
programs that are needed to find long term answers," he testified.
Lawson reminded panel members that Senate Resolution 98, which passed
by a 95 - 0 vote, said that a treaty would not be ratified if it
is not global or if it harms the United States economy. "Kyoto
does not meet either test and clearly will not be approved by the
Senate," he stressed.
S. 882, The Energy and Climate Policy Act of 1999, and S. 1776,
The Climate Change Energy Policy Response Act, were the subject
of today's hearing. Lawson said the measures represent the sensible,
long term, technology driven approach to the climate change issue
that is needed.
Unlike the short term, economically devastating and globally ineffective
command and control regime that would be required by the Kyoto Protocol,
Lawson said the approach embodied in these bills would strengthen
our economy and at the same time enable us to continue to be a leader
in innovation and new technology development. "The approach
is sound economic policy, it is sound international policy, it is
sound energy policy," he stressed.
"It is time to move beyond Kyoto and the provisions of S.
882 and S. 1776 allow us to do that. The legislation we are discussing
today will help us to proceed now, in a non-regulated environment,
to develop technology to reduce and sequester emissions so that
we can act quickly if at some time in the future, science concludes
that action is necessary."
Lawson pointed out that you cannot discuss climate change policy
without talking about energy as over 85% of man-made greenhouse
gas emissions come from energy production and use.
"Energy use is expected to increase in the United States and
more rapidly in the developing countries of the world. Energy has
and will continue to be necessary to support economic growth. Coal,
oil, natural gas, renewables and nuclear power are all needed if
we are to have a chance of bringing the populations of the developing
world to standards even remotely close to that that we enjoy in
the United States. This is a reality that must be factored into
any serious climate policy for it to have any chance of success,"
he testified.
"This reality is not factored into Kyoto. Kyoto is so costly
in the short term - to the United States economy as well as to the
economies of most developed nations - that resources will not be
available to develop the technologies that are needed in the longer
time frame to ensure that energy is used most efficiently and with
minimal environmental impact throughout the globe. Kyoto is ineffective,
as it is not a global agreement. It does not address the developing
world where emissions will continue in a steep upward path."
Lawson stressed that there is a better way to address climate and
to be ready for the possibility that emission levels would have
to be reduced. The voluntary actions that are being taken by many
industries including mining, will make a difference now, he said.
"The technologies that are now being developed will make a
difference in the future. Technology that will enhance the efficiency
of electricity generation with coal is especially important, as
much of our nation's future electricity requirements will be met
with coal. Coal fired electricity will be equally important in the
developing world as their energy use expands. And, a number of research
efforts designed to reduce CO2 emissions associated with coal use,
or, to actually eliminate them through sequestration, are underway,"
he testified.
In conclusion, Lawson said both S. 882 and S. 1776 will move this
and other research along. "The non-regulatory, long term approaches
taken by this proposed legislation are good economic policy, good
energy policy and good climate policy."
|